Legal Opinion

Schloss Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City of Charlotte

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1980No. 8026SC439PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

A complaint should not be dismissed under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim unless plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief. Sutton v. Duke, 227 N.C. 94, 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970); Brown v. Brown, 21 N.C. App. 435, 204 S.E. 2d 534 (1974). The only times, then, when dismissal is proper are: (1) when the complaint on its face reveals that no law supports plaintiff’s claim; (2) when the complaint reveals on its face that some fact essential to plaintiff’s claim is missing; and (3) when some fact disclosed in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Guilford Realty & Insurance Co. v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Williams v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Carolina Power & Light Company v. CreasmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Oates v. Jag, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Morrow v. Kings Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Mabrey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Smith v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API