BORDEN, INCORPORATED v. Brower
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
This appeal poses the sole question: Was defendant’s evidence in support of his defenses and counterclaim admissible?
Plaintiff’s evidence establishes a prima facie case for an unpaid balance on a promissory note under seal. Plaintiff contends that the material facts set forth in defendant’s answer, deposition, and affidavits offered by defendant in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment were inadmissible in evidence because of the parol evidence rule, and that the trial court properly granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
Affidavits filed in opposition…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Evans v. Freeman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Kerchner v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Briley v. FarabowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. First Mortgage InvestorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Smith v. Central Soya of Athens, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
- Strickland v. DoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.