Legal Opinion
Forbes v. Merrill Lynch, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 26, 1997No. 96 Civ. 7461(CBM)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a former employee of defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”), alleges that defendants have violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., and the New York Executive Law § 296. Plaintiff also claims that the defendants have committed the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendants make this motion to dismiss count two (relating to the alleged violation of the New York Executive Law) and count three (relating to the tort of intentional infliction of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lee Nuwesra, Esq., Ernesto Forbes v. Merrill Lynch, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Yolanda D'Apuzzo and Anthony DibiaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Castagna v. LucenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Meckenberg v. New York City Off-Track BettingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Kolesnikow v. Hudson Valley Hospital CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Mariani v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.