Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Sundstrom

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding in which the Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar has recommended that the accused’s license to practice law be suspended for a period of two years and thereafter until it is reinstated pursuant to Rule 8.55 of the Rules for the Admission of Attorneys. Three members of the Board of Governors recommended that the suspension be for a period of one year.

The Trial Committee found the accused guilty of being unavailable to his clients and the public for a two month period (Opinion No. 130 of Opinions of the Oregon State Bar Committee on Legal Ethics), the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In Re KitchenOregon Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LauryOregon Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API