Legal Opinion

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1949No. 33497PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHalley, J.

In this case the State Industrial Commission awarded compensation to Ora D. Gentry, hereinafter referred to as respondent, and against Montgomery Ward & Company, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, for temporary total and permanent partial disability to respondent’s arm.

Petitioner brings the case here for review and challenges the . award on the sole ground that the evidence shows respondent, at the time he sustained his injury, was not engaged in any employment defined as hazardous by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and that the commission was therefore without jurisdiction to award…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Veazey Drug Co. v. BruzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Hurley v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Spivey & McGill v. NixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Crown Drug Co. v. HofstromSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. NickensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dalton Barnard Hdwe. Co. v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Teaney v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Fetteroff v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Lewis v. Montgomery Ward and CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Melton v. A. C. F. Wrigley, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API