Teaney v. State Industrial Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
There is involved here for review an order of the State Industrial Court sitting en banc approving an award of the trial judge allowing the respondent, George W. Cox, claimant below, temporary total compensation benefits under the provisions of the Oklahoma Workmen’s Compensation Act. Parties will be referred to as they appeared before the State Industrial Court.
The principal contention of the respondent on appeal is that the claimant did not sustain compensable injuries while employed and working at a hazardous occupation within the purview of the Oklahoma Workmen’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spivey & McGill v. NixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- J. B. Herd Hardware Co. v. KirbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- E. M. Mildred Agency v. YatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hieronimus v. Phillips Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Neal v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- City of Oklahoma City v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Town of Boswell v. TraboldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977