Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 8, 2002No. 01-15091PublishedCited by 276 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
2Per curiam
ORDER
The opinion of this court filed March 8, 2002, 282 F.3d 780, slip op. at 3859, is amended as follows:
On page 3863 of the slip opinion, add the following sentence to the end of the first full paragraph: “The plaintiffs’ claim that the state parole board is categorically denying inmates consideration for parole because of their disability, drug addiction, survives the Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion.”
On page 3863 of the slip opinion, in the last paragraph delete “primarily due to” and replace with “because of.” On page 3869 of the slip opinion, in the paragraph…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Robert E. Weinreich v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Gohier v. EnrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by276 opinions
- Richard McGary v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Charles R. Jackson v. Tom L. Carey R. Papac, Lt. J. Marshall A. Davis E. Padilla Burton R. Lieberman, DoctorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- O'GUINN v. Lovelock Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- John Draper v. D. RosarioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.