Legal Opinion
Robert E. Weinreich v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1997No. 95-55991PublishedCited by 295 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
Robert E. Weinreich appeals from the district court’s judgment, after a bench trial, in favor of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). We affirm the district court’s judgment that the MTA did not discriminate against Weinreich on the basis of his disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., or Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (Rehabilitation Act).
The MTA, a regional public transit system, offers a Reduced Fare Program (“Program”) for elderly and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vernon Crowder Stephanie Good v. Yukio Kitagawa, Chairman, Board of Agriculture, State of Hawaii Calvin LumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Nicki Arron Bonner v. Mr. Lewis, Director at Adoc Cpo Crowley Cpo VegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- James Paul Doherty, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Southern College of Optometry, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Sandison v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by295 opinions
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Vinson v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Duvall v. County of KitsapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.