Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 28, 2001No. 00-15132PublishedCited by 424 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Concurrence by Judge BERZON
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
The facts established at trial, and not disputed on appeal, demonstrate that the State of California regularly discriminated against disabled prisoners and parolees during its parole and parole revocation hearing processes. The district court found that the California Board of Prison Terms (the state parole authority) failed to make proper accommodations for numerous disabled prisoners and parolees, with the result that a number of such individuals forfeited their rights to parole and parole revocation hearings…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by424 opinions
- Scott Nordstrom v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Manuel De Jesus Ortega Melendr v. Joseph M. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
419 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.