Legal Opinion
Charles R. Jackson v. Tom L. Carey R. Papac, Lt. J. Marshall A. Davis E. Padilla Burton R. Lieberman, Doctor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 24, 2003No. 01-17126PublishedCited by 297 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Inmate Charles Jackson filed a complaint in federal district court, claiming that defendants Carey, Papac, Marshall, Davis, and Padilla (collectively “the prison officials”) violated his constitutional rights when they allowed his transfer to Corcor-an-Security Housing Unit (Corcoran-SHU) after his successful appeal, which ordered the reissue and rehearing of the rule violation report at- issue in this case. Jackson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his second amended complaint for failure to state a claim. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).
Construing Jackson’s pro se…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by297 opinions
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hearns v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Richard McGary v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Alvarez v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Nevada Department of Corrections v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
292 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.