Legal Opinion
Richard McGary v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 27, 2004No. 02-35668PublishedCited by 374 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Richard McGary brought this action against the City of Portland, alleging that the City discriminated against him on the basis of his disability, in violation of the Fair Housing Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and parallel state and local laws, when it denied his request for additional time to clean his yard in order to comply with the City’s nuisance abatement ordinance. The district court dismissed McGary’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). On appeal, we hold…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by374 opinions
- Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Robertson v. Las Animas County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Mary Jo C. v. New York State and Local Retirement System et ano.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- O'GUINN v. Lovelock Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
369 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.