Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. California Oregon Power Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1960PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The plaintiffs brought this suit to reform a contract entered into between the plaintiff Gilbert and defendant, and for damages for breach of the contract as reformed. The defendant denied the allegations of the plaintiffs’ complaint and by cross-complaint demanded judgment for the unpaid balance due from plaintiffs to defendant on the purchase of a sawmill.

The trial court denied reformation, found that the plaintiffs were in default of the contract of purchase of a sawmill and entered judgment against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendant for the sum of $10,849.35. From this decree…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kontz v. B. P. John Furniture Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Winklebleck v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Harmer v. TraceyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n v. PirieOregon Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mignot v. ParkhillOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Fish v. FleishmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Mendieta v. STATE, DIVISION OF STATE LANDSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Anderson v. AllisonOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Sunset Presbyterian Church v. Brockamp & Jaeger, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API