Legal Opinion

Winklebleck v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

In the year 1932 the city of Portland desired to widen a thoroughfare in that city known as Fourth Street Extension in the vicinity of its intersection with Gibbs street. At that time the plaintiff was the vendee in a contract, dated August 18,1925, in which his vendor, Bertha Jones, agreed to convey title to him to the 50 x 100 foot lot situated at the southwest corner of Gibbs and Second streets, at a price of $1,500, payable in installments over a long course of time. Subsequently the vendor’s interest passed to Addie M. Marshall. Situated upon the lot was a small house, 35 years old.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Spencer v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. City of Astoria v. American La France Fire Engine Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  5. Leonard v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Morris v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Yellow Cab Co. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Copper River School District v. TrawAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API