Legal Opinion

Sunset Presbyterian Church v. Brockamp & Jaeger, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2014No. CC C091601CV; CA A146006; SC S061171, S061185PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

In this construction defect case, we interpret the meaning of the contractual term “date of substantial completion” and the statutory term “substantial completion” to decide whether defendants were entitled to summary judgment on the basis that plaintiffs tort claims were barred either by the statute of limitations or by the statute of ultimate repose. We conclude that defendants were not entitled to summary judgment, affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, reverse the judgment of the trial court, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

We take the following uncontested…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Morgan v. State Farm Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Rice v. RabbOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Gilbert v. California Oregon Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. PIH Beaverton, LLC v. Super One, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wieck v. HostetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Riverview Condominium Ass'n v. Cypress Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. PIH Beaverton, LLC v. Super One, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Shell v. Schollander CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. King v. Warner Pac. Coll., an Or. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API