Legal Opinion

Dean v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 29, 2010No. 09-392 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court is the government’s motion to dismiss (“motion”). In this action, plaintiff alleges that he was wrongfully discharged from the United States Air Force (“Air Force”) without being assigned the correct percentage rating for service-connected disabilities. The government moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) on the basis that the governing statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501, precludes the court from entertaining the complaint. The court deems oral argument…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Cronin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  3. Gay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Cronin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Shinogee Ex Rel. Duffy v. FanningDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API