Legal Opinion
Central Pines Land Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 7, 2011No. 98-314LPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court in this case involving the plaintiffs’ claims of a Fifth Amendment taking without just compensation is the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The court has previously issued a number of opinions in this case on motions for summary judgment; following trial on liability and damages, the court issued an opinion awarding the plaintiffs $1,667,042.86 plus interest, representing the fair market value of the government’s temporary taking of portions…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Coastal Environmental Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.