Legal Opinion
Molski v. Mandarin Touch Restaurant
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 30, 2005No. CV 04-0450 ERPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF STANDING
RAFEEDIE, Senior District Judge.
On February 8, 2005, the Court issued an order to show cause why Plaintiff Jarek Molski’s claim alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181, et seq., should not be dismissed for lack of standing. On May 18, 2005, the Court issued an order indicating that the Court intended to treat the order to show cause as a motion for summary judgment, citing the extensive factual record submitted. The parties were given the option of filing additional briefing and exhibits, or standing on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brenda Pickern Floyd Smyth Paul Heard, and Jerry Doran v. Holiday Quality Foods IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Parr v. L & L Drive-Inn RestaurantDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- Hoepfl v. BarlowDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Harris v. Stonecrest Care Auto Center, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Molski v. Kahn WineryDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Marradi v. K&W Realty Investment LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Brooke v. Kashl Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.