Legal Opinion
Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 31, 2007No. 05-56452PublishedCited by 549 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal presents two orders of the district court for our review. The first order declared Jarek Molski a vexatious litigant and ordered that Molski obtain leave of the court before filing any claims under Title III of the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The second order sanctioned the law firm representing Molski, Thomas E. Frankovieh, a Professional Law Corporation (“the Frankovieh Group”), by requiring it to obtain leave of the court before filing any claims under Title III of the ADA in the Central…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by549 opinions
- Jason Lee Harris v. J. Kenneth MangumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Justin Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- D'LIL v. Best Western Encina Lodge & SuitesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Skaff v. Meridien North America Beverly Hills, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
544 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.