Legal Opinion
Molski v. Kahn Winery
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 15, 2005No. Case CV 04-347 ERPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF STANDING
RAFEEDIE, Senior District Judge.
In light of the Court’s recent holding on the issue of standing in Molski v. Mandarin Touch, 385 F.Supp.2d 1042 (C.D.Cal. 2005), the Court issued an order to show cause why plaintiff Jarek Molski’s claim alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181, et seq., should not be dismissed for lack of standing. See Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles, 279 F.3d 862, 868 (9th Cir.2001) (noting the Court has “both the power and the duty to raise the adequacy of [a plaintiffs] standing sua…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Angela Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles Lloyd W. Pellman, Individually Lloyd W. Pellman, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Brenda Pickern Floyd Smyth Paul Heard, and Jerry Doran v. Holiday Quality Foods IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Doug Wander v. Jack S. Kaus Irene B. KausCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Anderson v. Macy's, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Payne v. Chapel Hill North Properties, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Gaylor v. Greenbriar of Dahlonega Shopping Center, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Bodley v. Plaza Management Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2008
- Betancourt v. River Lanes of Titusville IncDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.