Legal Opinion
Brooke v. Kashl Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 25, 2019No. CASE NO. 18cv2581 GPC NLSPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(1) DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF No. 9];(2) DEFERRING RULING ON MOTION REQUESTING ORDER DECLARING PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT [ECF No. 3];(3) TO SHOW CAUSE.
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge
On December 15, 2018, Plaintiff Theresa Brooke ("Plaintiff") filed a verified first amended complaint against Defendants Kashl Corporation ("Kashl") and Radisson Hotels International, Inc., alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, and the California Disabled Persons Act. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff's suit has generated two motions,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Camarillo v. Balboa Thrift and Loan AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Dozier v. Gasco Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Export Development Canada v. Custom Produce SalesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Johnson v. Rosvin, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Johnson v. WoldeselassieDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.