Legal Opinion

Parr v. L & L Drive-Inn Restaurant

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided May 16, 2000No. 97-00729 FIYPublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

YAMASHITA, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Background and Procedural History

On June 5, 1997, Plaintiff Eric Parr (“Plaintiff’), a disabled individual who requires a wheelchair to gain mobility, filed an action against Defendant L & L Drive-Inn Restaurant, d/b/a L & L Drive-Inn. (“Defendant” or “L & L”). In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant violated the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., by failing to remove architectural barriers to access. (See Complaint).

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Brenda Pickern Floyd Smyth Paul Heard, and Jerry Doran v. Holiday Quality Foods IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Vogel v. Rite Aid Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  5. Dudley v. Hannaford Bros.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API