Walker v. Green Lake County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
In support of its judgment the county contends upon this appeal that the plaintiffs had the burden of proving their title to land capable of being described and located with reasonable certainty; that they failed to do so and that Swan Point can neither be located by a survey nor described by metes and bounds. In ascertaining the boundaries of land conveyed, the real intention of the parties is to be gathered from the entire writing and when necessary from the surrounding circumstances. Sanborn v. Miski, 190 Wis. 513, 209 N. W. 759; Wisconsin Realty Co. v. Lull, 177 Wis. 53, 187 N. W. 978.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spence v. FrantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Wisconsin Realty Co. v. LullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Haase v. Kingston Co-operative Creamery Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Jacobosky v. Town of AhnapeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- Town of Hustisford v. KnuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Russell Dairy Stores, Inc. v. City of Chippewa FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Miller v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Heise v. Village of PewaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Mauler v. Bayfield CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2001
- Muschel v. Town of MolitorCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.