Russell Dairy Stores, Inc. v. City of Chippewa Falls
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
The state of Wisconsin was not named as a party in this action, nor did the complaint demand that the state provide a right of ingress to or egress from Highway 53 to the plaintiff’s property. While the summons and complaint were served upon the state as required in sec. 269.56 (11), Stats., and while the district attorney of Chippewa county entered a special appearance on behalf of the state for the purpose of challenging the jurisdiction affecting the rights of the state, the state declined to participate in the trial. By its complaint, the plaintiff sought enforcement of its right to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- City of Buffalo v. . ChadeayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Rosenberg v. Village of Whitefish BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Rehmann v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Stevens v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of ShelbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Village of Hobart v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Village of Hobart v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Anne Arundel Cty. v. Whitehall Ven.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- City of Hutchinson v. OttoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.