Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Realty Co. v. Lull

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1922PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

This sketch helps to illustrate the situation :

*59Defendants’ assertion of title to the 173 acres found to lie between the meandered lines in the field-notes and reproduced in the plat of 1856, and the river as actually existing, is based upon the language in the warranty deed to it in 1905 by the then owner of the property, the Land Company, and reading as follows:

“Lot 1 in section 21, being all the land in said section north of the Flambeau river and containing 65.48 acres more or less according to the United States government survey.”

Upon this language and the covenant of warranty in said…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Producers Oil Co. v. HanzenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Lee Wilson & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Security Land & Exploration Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Chapman & Dewey Lumber Co. v. St. Francis Levee DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Mendota Club v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hirt v. EntusWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Gardner v. GreenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Smith v. Town of FowlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Smith v. OsbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Walker v. Green Lake CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API