Legal Opinion

Spence v. Frantz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1928PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, J.(1) The first question presented is whether the contract required the plaintiffs to pay for the land in the public highway at the rate of $850 an acre. The determination of this question depends upon the intent of the parties as expressed in their contract when that is viewed in the light of the established rules of law with reference tb which they must be held to have contracted.

It has long been the established law in Wisconsin that the abutting owner has title to the center of the highway or street adjacent to his property, subject to the public easément. It is equally clear that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norcross v. GriffithsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Gove v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Durkin v. MacheskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Hannon v. ScanlonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Heller v. BairdWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kuester v. RowlandsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Stuesser v. EbelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Walker v. Green Lake CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Kenner v. Edwards Realty & Finance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Town of Greenfield v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API