United States v. Fung Chong Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’CoNNEll, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
This is an appeal from a judgment of tbe United States Customs Court, Third Division, C. D. 937, sustaining tbe protest of tbe importer tbat two items of merchandise comprising “2 Cases Dried Sweet Kumquat Orange in jar” and “10 cases Pres. Kumquat Orange in jar” were dutiable at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 as oranges and overruling tbe action of tbe Collector of Customs who classified and assessed tbe merchandise as prepared or preserved fruits at tbe higher rate of duty provided for in paragraph 752 of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Acker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Quong Lee v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Lamont v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Bar Zel Expediters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Timber Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Timber Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006