Legal Opinion

Huffy Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 27, 1986No. 83-8-01180PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CARMAN, Judge:

Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Rule 56.1 motion for judgment upon the agency record challenging the final determination of the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (ITA) of sales at less than fair value in Bicycles from Taiwan, 48 Fed.Reg. 31,688 (1983). Defendant opposes the motion,, as does defendant-intervenor Taiwan Transportation Vehicle Manufacturers Association. All parties have submitted comprehensive briefs and the record is quite extensive.

The ITA investigated sixteen Taiwanese bicycle manufacturers and found that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Rhone Poulenc, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  3. Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  4. American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  5. Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  2. Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. Primary Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  4. Mantex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  5. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API