Legal Opinion
Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 24, 1985No. Court 84-7-01058PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
DiCARLO, Judge:
Plaintiffs, domestic producers of tire tubes, challenge a final determination by the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (Commerce) that tubes for tires, other than bicycle tires, (inner tubes) from Korea are not being sold in the United States at less than fair value. Tubes For Tires, Other Than Bicycle Tires, From the Republic of Korea (Final), Antidumping Investigation No. A-580-009, 49 Fed.Reg. 26,780 (1984).
I. BACKGROUND
In July, 1983 seven domestic producers (petitioners) petitioned Commerce on behalf of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Negev Phosphates, Ltd. v. United States Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Chemical Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Alberta Pork Producers' Marketing Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.