Legal Opinion
Rhone Poulenc, S.A. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 19, 1984No. Court 81-1-00079PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RESTANI, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Rhone Poulenc, S.A., and Rhone Poulenc, Inc., (“Rhone Poulenc”) 1 challenge the final determination of the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “Commission”), pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1673d(b)(i)(A)(ii) (1982) that an industry in the United States is threatened with material injury by reason of imports of anhydrous sodium metasilicate (ASM) from France, 2 and the determination of the United States International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce (“ITA”) of sales at Less Than Fair Value (“LTFV”) pursuant to 19 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Chaparral Steel Company v. The United States, and Norsk Jernverk A.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Maine Potato Council v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.