Lauder v. Wright Investment Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
In 1950 defendants commenced subdividing operations on 36 acres of unimproved hillside ranch land located in the North Hollywood section of Los Angeles. Vineland Avenue is adjacent to defendants’ subdivision and is the last improved street prior to defendants’ development. Plaintiff’s home is on the southeast corner of Vineland Avenue and Fruitland Drive, which latter street deadends at this intersection. Defendants’ tract lies to the southwest of Vineland Avenue and at a higher elevation than plaintiff’s property. There were unusually heavy rains in this vicinity during the period of January…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Saks & Co. v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Jackson v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Summers v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3Cited by6 opinions
- Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- South Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. ButtlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Kruse Metals Manufacturing Co. v. Utility Trailer Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Downey v. Santa Fe Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.