Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Burke

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1954No. Civ. 8315PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Plaintiff, a judgment creditor of Plumas Land Company, a Nevada corporation, commenced an action against defendants to set aside a deed of trust executed by said company, defendant Coleman Burke being named as beneficiary under said deed of trust. The complaint alleged that defendants were officers, directors and stockholders of said company and that said deed of trust “was placed upon said real property for the purpose of hindering, delaying and defrauding the creditors of said corporation, including this plaintiff, and that said encumbrance was made without adequate or any consideration.”

Def…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Arnold v. HadgisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Asadoorian v. KludjianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. T W M Homes, Inc. v. Atherwood Realty & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Tidlund v. Seven Up Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. McIntyre v. Doe & RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. In Re Guardianship of ChandosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API