Myers v. Patterson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Chief Judge:
The plaintiffs, as taxpayers, allege that an appropriation of gasoline tax revenue contained in the 1992 Appropriation Act violates the constitution by diverting the funds to a purpose other than that for which they were collected. We find no constitutional violation and enter judgment accordingly.
I. FACTS
In 1987, the Legislature levied additional gasoline taxes for the purpose of funding the Strategic Highway Plan for Improving Mobility and Safety (SHIMS). Act No. 197, § 1, 1987 5.C. Acts 2198 (modified at S.C. Code Ann. § 12-27-1210 to -1320 (Supp. 1987). In 1992, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shillito v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Edwards v. OsborneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Edwards v. OsborneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Kirk v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Wolper v. City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Carolina Alliance for Fair Employment v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, & RegulationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Town of Hilton Head Island v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Bodman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013