Legal Opinion
Kirk v. Clark
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 18, 1939No. 14919PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fishuburne.
Appellant, the holder of certain refunding bonds of the County of Chesterfield, suing on behalf of himself and other bondholders of the same issue of bonds, brought this suit in equity against the County Board of Commissioners and the treasurer of Chesterfield County, seeking the injunctive aid of the Court to restrain the respondents from misapplying and diverting tax funds levied and collected for the payment of the interest on his bonds; and to require that such funds be devoted to the purpose for which they were collected.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mauldin v. Council of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
- City of Newport v. McLaneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Martin v. SayeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Hull v. AmesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Southern Railway Co. v. Cherokee CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Shillito v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Crews v. BeattieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Sloan v. School Dist. of Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Custom Recording Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
- United States v. .8677 Acre of LandDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.