Legal Opinion

Wolper v. City Council of Charleston

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 13, 1985No. 22406PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Chief Justice:

Appellant Wolper brought this declaratory judgment action challenging the constitutionality of an ordinance enacted by the respondent City which authorizes a tax increment financing plan for the redevelopment of waterfront property within the City. The trial judge upheld the ordinance. We affirm.

Article X, Section 14(10) of the South Carolina Constitution authorizes municipalities to incur indebtedness for redevelopment within an incorporated municipality, with debt service to be provided from the increased increments of property tax revenue which result from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. City of Canton v. CrouchIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bauer v. South Carolina State Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Edwards v. OsborneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Deloach v. ScheperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Cox v. BatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. WDW PROPERTIES v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Nichols v. South Carolina Research AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. South Carolina Public Service Authority v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. City of Hartford v. KirleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API