Legal Opinion
Dow v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 30, 1998No. 97-162PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
The plaintiff, Ellice Dow, appeals an order of the Superior Court {Gray, J.) dismissing her appeal of a finding of no probable cause by a commissioner for the commission for human rights (commission). We affirm.
Dow worked for the defendant, Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears), as a sales person in its Newington store from October to December 1993. Sears terminated her employment the following February.
Shortly thereafter, Dow filed discrimination charges with the commission and the United States Equal Employment Opportunity *167Commission (EEOC), alleging that her diabetes and diabetic neuropathy were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atwood v. OwensSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Brouillard v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Douglas v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Northern New England, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
- Bothwick v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Belluscio v. Town of WestmorelandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HattSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- In re PerkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Franklin Lodge of Elks v. MarcouxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Pino v. F.W. Webb Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999
- Usher v. Cracker BarrelDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007