Legal Opinion
State v. Hatt
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 25, 1999No. 97-700PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant, Guy Hatt, was convicted after a bench trial in Superior Court (Conboy, J.) of armed robbery. See RSA 636:1 (1996). We affirm.
The following undisputed facts were adduced at trial. In January 1997, the defendant entered a store in Hollis, pointed an unloaded handgun at the cashier, and demanded that she give him the money in the cash register. As he left the store, he warned that if she called the police, he would kill her.
The defendant was charged with robbing the store while being actually armed with a deadly weapon. See RSA 636:1, 111(a). He conceded that he could be convicted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- McLaughlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. RileyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- State v. HarnumSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HullSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. KousounadisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. LongleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- State v. LongleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Asmussen v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of SafetySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.