Legal Opinion
Brouillard v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 8, 1997No. 95-335PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The plaintiffs, Robert E and Loretta N. Brouillard, appeal a ruling of the Superior Court {Morrill, J.) denying a petition for declaratory judgment. The Brouillards sought to establish their right to underinsured motorist benefits from the defendant, Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Prudential). We affirm.
The trial court found the following facts. On March 1, 1989, Robert Brouillard was injured while riding as a passenger in an automobile operated by Philip Bourgoine. Mr. Brouillard collected $100,000 from Bourgoine’s insurance carrier for his injuries. The Brouillards then…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Johnson Shoes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Andrews v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Gelinas v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Littlefield v. Acadia InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- EnergyNorth Natural Gas, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Deyette v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BuckallewMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- A.J. Cameron Sod Farms, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.