Legal Opinion

Franklin Lodge of Elks v. Marcoux

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 12, 2001No. 99-813PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The petitioner, the Franklin Lodge of Elks (Lodge), appeals an order of the Trial Court (Manias, J.) granting the respondents’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse and remand.

The relevant facts follow. The respondents, Sally Marcoux, Terry Bergeron-Hoyt, Renee LaBonte and Jo-Ann LaBonte, successfully argued to the New Hampshire Human Rights Commission (commission) that the Lodge was a place of public accommodation and they were entitled to relief pursuant to RSA chapter 354-A because the Lodge denied them admission based upon their gender. After a hearing, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doggett v. Town of North Hampton Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. Dermody v. Town of Gilford Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. Phetteplace v. Town of LymeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  4. Daniel v. B & J RealtySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. Dow v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Remsburg v. Docusearch, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State of New Hampshire v. The Mandatory Poster Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API