Shenandoah Mining & Milling Co. v. Morgan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This suit is prosecuted by the Shenandoah Mining and Milling Company, a corporation, against A. C. Morgan, Sarah L. Morgan, and Fred Schoulder, to enjoin them from interfering with plaintiff’s alleged right to take water from certain springs for the use of its mine and mill. Findings and judgment were for the plaintiff, and defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The second amended complaint alleged that in 1882, for the purpose of securing a water supply for their quartz-mill, plaintiff took possession of certain springs known as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Osgood v. El Dorado Water & Deep Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Mondran v. GouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Bryan v. TormeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Howell v. SlausonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Olive Land & Development Co. v. OlmsteadU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1900
- Riverside Water Co. v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Scott v. Fruit Growers Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.