Legal Opinion

Howell v. Slauson

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1890No. 13216PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Gibson, C.

— This action was brought to quiet title to a portion of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 18, township 2 south, range 13 west, San Bernardino meridian, and to recover the possession thereof. Defendant had judgment, from which, and an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff claims title by virtue of mesne conveyances from L. Ketchum, a patentee of the United States; *541and the defendant, under similar conveyances from F. S. Clough and P. H. Newbill, patentees of the state of California, and also by his own adverse possession, and by virtue of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  2. McCreery v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Tubbs v. WilhoitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Pratt v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones v. Madison CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Olive Land & Development Co. v. OlmsteadU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1900
  3. In re Dewar's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Andrews v. MetznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Georgeson v. SteinhoferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API