Scott v. Fruit Growers Supply Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Lassen County, which enjoins defendant and appellant from conducting the water of Bagwell Springs through a pipe-line constructed by appellant in 1924 from Bagwell Springs to its mill-pond on the south bank of the , Susan River, in Lassen County, California. The geographical and topographical conditions involved in the controversy are best illustrated with a map and chart, but the findings of the trial court have described such conditions substantially as follows:
Susan River comes out of the mountains to the west of the town of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Nev. Cty. & Sacramento Canal Co. v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hargrave v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- North Fork Water Co. v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- City of Los Angeles v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Albaugh v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.