Legal Opinion

Scott v. Fruit Growers Supply Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1927No. Docket No. Sac. 3895PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Lassen County, which enjoins defendant and appellant from conducting the water of Bagwell Springs through a pipe-line constructed by appellant in 1924 from Bagwell Springs to its mill-pond on the south bank of the , Susan River, in Lassen County, California. The geographical and topographical conditions involved in the controversy are best illustrated with a map and chart, but the findings of the trial court have described such conditions substantially as follows:

Susan River comes out of the mountains to the west of the town of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Nev. Cty. & Sacramento Canal Co. v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Hargrave v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. North Fork Water Co. v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  3. City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  4. City of Los Angeles v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Albaugh v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API