Fonseca v. City of Gilroy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUFFY, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment following the trial court’s denial of a petition for writ of mandate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1085. Plaintiffs Norma Fonseca and Terry Wilson sued the City of Gilroy and its city council 1 to, among other things, set aside the City’s 2002 general plan on the basis that its housing element does not meet or substantially comply with the requirements of the “Housing Element Law” codified at Government Code sections 65580 through 655S9.8. 2 On appeal, plaintiffs, who are appellants here, reprise their challenge to the City’s 2002…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- San Franciscans for Livable Neighborhoods v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- St. Vincent's School for Boys, Catholic Charities CYO v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- San Jose Unified School District v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.