Maas v. W. R. Arthur & Co.

The action is brought to recover from W. R. Arthur & Company, Inc., and its insurer, for injuries sustained by the plaintiff in a collision of his automobile which he was driving with a truck driven by a servant of the defendant, W. R. Arthur & Company, Inc.

Two propositions are involved: (1) The plaintiff-respondent moves to dismiss the appeal for want of proper service of notice of appeal upon respondent’s counsel. (2) The appellant contends that the judgment is erroneous.(1) The ground of the motion to dismiss is alleged failure of the defendants to serve a notice of appeal on plaintiff’s…