Legal Opinion

Giemza v. Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1960PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

Egly and Giemza raise many issues on the appeal but because we are of the opinion that a new trial must be had, only those issues relating to granting a new trial will be discussed. Egly and Sweet started out from the Circle Inn about two miles east of the place of the accident. At the tavern, Egly, the Sweets, Giemza, and others were gathered. There was some drinking and conversation on this early evening of the Fourth of July. The testimony, is conflicting, but there was some talk of the relative merits of Egly’s and Sweet’s cars and whether there would be a race. Disinterested witnesses…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scory v. LaFaveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Maas v. W. R. Arthur & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Wiley v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Veverka v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Miller v. KujakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Boykin v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Theisen v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ogle v. AvinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bierczynski v. RogersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  5. Calahan v. WoodUtah Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API