Legal Opinion

Bond v. Breeding

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenbeRRY, C. J.

On January 12, 1940, the defendants and the intervenors Gold and Stark filed a motion in this court to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was not served upon all of the parties bound by the judgment 'under the rule laid down in Stevens v. Jacobs (1937), 226 Wis. 198, 275 N. W. 555, 276 N. W. 638. Counsel for plaintiffs in effect concede that if Stevens v. Jacobs be applied as written that the appeal must be dismissed. Appellants rely upon secs. 269.17 and 269,18, Stats,, relating to the revival of actions, and contend that these sections apply to the supreme court.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stevens v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Higgins v. HawksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Maas v. W. R. Arthur & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hirchert v. HirchertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Kolberg v. KaebischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API