Estate of White
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The first problems have to do with our jurisdiction and with the rights of parties to be heard. The respondent administrator de bonis non questions the jurisdiction of this court to hear the appeal and the appellants say that such administrator is not an interested party and has no right to question or assert anything.
Jurisdiction is always of concern to us and if it is suspect it does not matter who calls a supposed defect to our attention. We will examine the record in such detail as may be necessary for us to come to a conclusion. The administrator points out that unless an extension of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Estate of Bailey v. CullenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Cline v. WhitakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Pugh v. FowlieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Maas v. W. R. Arthur & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Will of InbuschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- First Wis. Nat. Bank of Madison v. NicholaouWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Gallagher v. ScherneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Town of Madison v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. PerelesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Meyer v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.