Guth v. Fisher
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
It is first urged that the court erred in denying defendants’ motion for a directed verdict for the reason that plaintiff was guilty of negligence as a matter of law in regard to lookout. This contention is based upon the fact that the plaintiff, who was proceeding southerly on highway 51, knew that he was being followed by a car; that nevertheless he swung somewhat to his left in order to make a turn into the driveway in question and made the turn without looking back to see where the car in his rear was. The plaintiff was accompanied by his brother. His *327brother told him that there was a car…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Young v. Nunn, Bush & Weldon Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Loizzo v. ConfortiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Spice v. KuxmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nelson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Bohlman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Kowalke v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Maas v. W. R. Arthur & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Kasper v. KocherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.