Legal Opinion

Farmers Union Oil Company v. Fladeland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 12, 1970No. 42505PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff holder in an action on a note. Defendant, a comaker, contends that he was released from liability by the holder’s acceptance of a renewal note which defendant did not sign.

From the record it appears that John Fladeland sought a loan in early 1961 from plaintiff, Farmers Union Oil Company (of Red Lake Falls, Minnesota). The application was denied, but plaintiff’s agent suggested that the loan might be arranged if the applicant’s brother, Terrance Fladeland, joined with him on the note. On February 3, 1961, the brothers, John and Terrance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. McGlynn v. GranstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Miller v. McCartySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Hagen v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Barsness v. TiegenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Charles R. Peterson, in No. 80-2662 v. Crown Financial Corporation, a Corporation, in No. 80-2663Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. State v. PolskyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Rural American Bank of Greenwald v. HerickhoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Utah Farm Production Credit Ass'n v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State Bank of Young America v. Vidmar Iron Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API