Hagen v. First State Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover money deposited by the plaintiff with the defendant bank. There were findings for the plaintiff for $1,079.17 and interest, upon which judgment was entered, from which the plaintiff appeals, claiming that the judgment in his favor should have been substantially twice that amount.
By L. 1925, p. 37, c. 38, effective March 3, 1925, provision is made for the reorganization of insolvent state banks, and among other things the statute requires the consent of a certain.percentage of the depositors. This provision has no application to nonconsenting depositors whose deposits were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Hoff v. First State Bank of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Hunt v. RoosenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Willius v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farmers Union Oil Company v. FladelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Hirleman v. NickelsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Barsness v. TiegenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Timmer v. Hardwick State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Sueltz v. Bank of HazeltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931