Legal Opinion
McGlynn v. Granstrom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 19, 1926No. 25,470PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action by the payee against an indorser of a promissory note. After verdict for defendant, plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for judgment or a new trial.
The defense was that the payee was party to an executed oral contract with the maker and third parties which released the former. If the contract was made, the maker was discharged. The jury decided that issue for defendant. The evidence is conflicting and the verdict must stand. It is therefore a case where the indorser of the note is discharged because the maker has been discharged. Section 120, N. I. L. (§ 7163, G. S.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pitt v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Baldwin v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Whitcomb v. National Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Missouri State Life Insurance v. California State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
- Hall v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bank of the United States v. ManheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Brown v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Farmers Union Oil Company v. FladelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Portland Iron Works v. SiemensOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.